Entertainment
>
Movies / TV
Al's MLB Report for August 16th
Posted by Alan Keiper on Aug 15, 2004, 20:02
|
|
We have got lots to cover this week, so let us get right to it.
OWNERS TO RENEW SELIG
Next weekend the MLB owners are meeting in Philadelphia, and the first order of business
is reportably to give Bud Selig a three year contract extension, extending his term through
2009. I have said it many times before, but it bears repeating. Bud Selig is the worst
figure to enter baseball in the last twenty-five years. His failure to offer the players'
union a fair and just agreement robbed baseball of the 1994 postseason. The wild card has
made a mockery of divisional races. The extended playoffs have made it easier for great
teams to lose out to weaker teams, thus giving us the Anaheim Angels and Florida Marlins as
World Champions. And if you are a fan of those teams, I apologize, but the fact is they were
not the best teams in their own divisions. Selig repeatedly lied about baseball finances in
the face of Congress, independant analysts, and even Forbes Magazine. Selig's performance in
front of Congress several years ago brought shame upon the game.
Bud Selig repeatedly bullshit about competitive balance, when the truth was that it was
never a problem. Now that it has been effectively disproved, Selig claims it was his
solutions that fixed it. Meanwhile, the luxury tax not only failed to keep the Yankees'
payroll in check, it effectively crashed and burned, as the Yankees' payroll has doubled in
the last five years. Bud Selig allowed an inane team sale to go through, as he allowed John
Henry to purchase the Red Sox, Jeffrey Loria to purchase the Marlins, and for MLB to control the
Expos, thus leaving the good fans of Montreal high and dry as baseball controls their
franchise. The obvious conflict of interest of having one team owned by the other
twenty-nine is blinding, and its disgraceful that it has continued for almost three
years.
Bud Selig attempted to contract two teams, claiming finances (bullshit) and competitive
balance (bullshit) as the cause. It was little more than blackmail on the part of Selig and
the owners to coerce cities into
building brand new stadiums. He convinced several cities, namely Pittsburgh and
Milwaukee, into building new stadiums, claiming they were needed to compete. Not only did
the stadiums fail to improve their teams, they also failed to induce additional spending on
payroll.
And now we are stuck with this ass for another three years. It is time to face facts.
The commissioner is not an independant arbitrator of the game. He is a spokesman for the
owners. Unless we somehow find a way to replace all twenty-nine owners, Selig is not going
anywhere, nor will his replacement look any better. The time has come to take the
commissioner's position off of a pedistal. He is little more than a tool.
In other meeting topics, the owners will discuss the Baseball World Cup, and MLB TV. The
World Cup has been tossed around for several years now, but nothing has been finalized, and
it is doubtful it will occur next season. 2006 looks more likely. One major sticking point
is that Japan is uncomfortable with having MLB and the MLBPA call the shots. Personally, I
am apathetic towards a World Cup. I have the feeling the Cup will be little more than the
baseball we are all used to, with shuffled rosters. MLB TV is an idea similar to NBA TV, or
whatever the NFL produces. On the surface, it seems like common sense.
WHEN YOUR TEAM STINKS
As visitors to our forums are aware, I am
a devout Phillies fan. So it disheartens me to realize that the Phillies' season is
essentially lost. Sure, they are only 3.5 games out of the wild card, but Phillies fans are
conditioned to expect the worst, and besides, the Cubs have a much greater run differential.
That is the pain of being a smart baseball fan. You are the first to realize when it is
over.
Still, seasons come and go, and I know better than to over-react. What is maddening is
the recent series of moves the club has made in the last two weeks. The team traded Ricky
Ledee to the San Francisco Giants for Felix Rodriguez. That is perfectly fine. Ledee is not
a prospect, you can find another player like him, and the Phillies bullpen needed help.
Moreover, Rodriguez has pitched extremely well since joining the Phillies. However, Ed Wade
also traded Josh Hancock to the Cincinnati Reds for Todd Jones. Apparently you can not find
enough mediocre relievers. Josh Hancock is a reasonably good prospect, and could be a decent
fourth or fifth starter someday. Todd Jones is 36, and is hardly a great reliever anymore.
He is fast on the way towards becoming Jose Mesa III, and worse, Larry Bowa feels compelled
to use him every single day. There is nothing worse than trading appreciable prospects for
mediocre relievers, and it shows.
The best came earlier this week. The Phillies traded prospects Javon Moran, Joe Wilson,
AND Elizardo Ramirez to the Reds for pitcher Cory Lidle. Seriously, CORY F'N LIDLE?!
Since when did a 5.32 ERA become something for which you trade THREE prospects?! A 5.67 K/9
rate? Twenty-five home runs in 154 innings? To sum up the trade, the Phillies traded three
prospects for ten starts from a mediocre pitcher. Ever wonder how those stathead A's, with
their Moneyball mumbo-jumbo, keep winning the AL West? It is because they figured out
that Cory Lidle is not a pitcher for which you trade appreciable talent. And before anyone
mentions the 2001 trade, Lidle was the third best player they got in the deal. The Phillies
really need to learn the different between quality and replacement level talent.
PENNANT RACE UPDATE
Two weeks ago, I looked at each division and handicapped the races. We will make this a
weekly occurance for the remainder of the season, as the races develop.
AL East: The New York Yankees hold a 10.5 game lead over the Boston Red Sox.
Barring a miracle run from the Sox, the Yankees should coast to their seventh consecutive
division crown.
AL Central: Two weeks ago, I wrote that the Indians had an outside shot. Little
did we know. The Indians managed high time drama in Cleveland this weekend, as they pulled
within three games of the Twins, and took the first two games of a head-to-head series.
Sunday, the Twins and Indians went extra innings before the Twins pulled ahead. If the
Indians had won, they would have shared the division lead. But now, with the Indians two
games back, we just may have a race on our hands. Cleveland travels to Texas, and the Twins
host the Yankees. This weekend, the Twins host a three game series against the Indians.
These are definately some games to keep an eye on. Moreover, the Indians are very capable of
taking this division. Also keep an eye on the Chicago White Sox, who are not quite out of
the race.
AL West: The Oakland Athletics hold a slim half game lead on both the Texas Rangers
and the Anaheim Angels. A peak at the pythagorean records indicates a slight advantage for
Oakland, with the emphasis on slight. To begin the week, the Rangers host the Indians, the
Athletics travel to Baltimore, and the Angels travel to Tampa Bay, all for three games. This
weekend, the Angels travel to New York, the Athletics travel to Tampa Bay, and the Rangers
travel to Kansas City.
AL wild card: Anaheim, Texas, and Boston are all tied for the wild card lead.
Cleveland sits 2.5 games back, and the White Sox sit 4.5 games back. Boston hosts the Blue
Jays and than travels to Chicago to face the White Sox. Otherwise we have covered the other
teams. I think the Red Sox are the prohibitive favorites in this race.
NL East: The Braves hold an eight game lead over the Marlins and Phillies. At this point, the
Braves look likely to win their tenth consecutive division championship. How did they do it
this time? They have terrific up the middle players in Marcus Giles, Rafael Furcal, and
Andruw Jones. J.D. Drew has stayed healthy and post the monster numbers he has always been
capable of. Johnny Estrada hit .323, completely surpassing the expectations of analysts, and
making the Millwood trade look foolish the other way around. In addition, their pitching is
once again great. This is where Andruw Jones deserves credit. I truly believe he is the
best defensive center fielder of all time, and that seemingly ever pitcher performs well in
Atlanta, I have to think he is part of the cause.
NL Central: The Cardinals have opened a 13.5 game lead, which is all but
insurmountable. Have you ever listened to a sport fan explain why their team is the
favorite, because of A, B and C? They will tell you that player A will hit like he did in
his career year, pitcher B will stay healthy this time, and player C will have his breakout
season. That is essentially what has happened with the Cardinals. Everyone has exceeded
expectations here. NO ONE thought Tony Womack would hit well, or that Roger Cedeno would
return to his 1999 hitting form, or that Ray Lankford would do much of anything. Their
pitching staff is criticized as lacking a true ace, but fans often forget that the Cardinals'
defense is outstanding, and even teams with great pitchers lack that defense. At this point,
the Cardinals are as dangerout a team as we will see in the postseason.
NL West: Two weeks ago, the Dodgers traded their heart and soul. How could any
team survive such a crippling trade? Somehow, the Dodgers are 6.5 games ahead in the NL
West. Of note: new acquisition Steve Finley has hit .467 since joining the Dodgers.
NL wild card: On the eve of the 1945 World Series, a sportswriter was asked who
would win between the Cubs and the Tigers. The scribe responded, "I don't think either team
can win." Listen to Cubs and Phillies fans, and this chase becomes a war of attrition,
simply a battle of which teams does not fall apart. In any case, the Cubs, San Diego Padres,
and San Francisco Giants are locked in a dead heat for first place. The Phillies and Marlins
sit 4.5 games back. The Giants draw a good week, hosting the Expos and then the Mets.
San Francisco's calling us, the Giants and Mets will play. Piazza, New York catcher,
are you straight or are you gay?
Belle & Sebastian's "Piazza, New York Catcher"
Back to reality, the Padres host the Braves and then the Marlins. The Chicago Cubs travel
to Milwaukee and than to Houston. Looking at run differentials, I think the Cubs are still
the favorites to take the wild card.
EDGAR FOR THE HALL?
One of the big news items of the week was the retirement of Edgar Martinez. Martinez will
leave the Mariners after this season, leaving behind a legacy of excellent hitting. With
Martinez's retirement imminent, the big discussion is whether Martinez deserves induction
into baseball's highest honor, the Baseball Hall of Fame. Detractors cite Edgar's short
career and subsequent lack of counting stats, and that Martinez was primarily a designated
hitter for most of his career. Supporters cite Edgar's superior hitting statistics.
Personally, I support Martinez for the Hall.
Before we begin, let me explain the various statistical devices I will reference in this
column.
OPS: Simply On Base Percentage plus Slugging Percentage. It provides a quick 'n'
dirty measure of overall production.
OPS+: OPS, adjusted for home park and normalized to the league average. It is then
presented as a number, where 100 is considered average, 110 is 10% better, and so on.
BR/A: Batting Runs above average, adjusted for park. This stat measures how many
runs a hitter creates beyond the contributions of an average hitter. Batting runs
issues weights for various hitting events.
RC: Runs Created. Similar to Batting runs, except the formula is more detailed,
and the baseline is zero. The formula is proven as if you were to run it for each individual
on a team, the result would come very close to the team's actual runs scored.
RC/27: Runs Created over 27 Outs. Essentially, this stat answers the question,
"how many runs per game would a team score if it had nine batters who hit like this?"
Win Shares: Win Shares attempts to separate an individual player's contribution to
wins from those of his team. From Total Baseball, "Win Shares starts with the
team's wins, and works backwards, figuring out a way to apportion those wins among the teams
players." Win Shares divides wins among offense and defense, from defense among pitching
and fielding, and from fielding among individual positions. They are then apportioned among
individual players. Wins are multiplied by three to create Win Shares.
TPW Total Player Wins. Similar to Win Shares, with two exceptions. One, TPW
starts with the league average, and issues a positive or negative number. Two, TPW starts
with a player's statistics, instead of ending there.
If you are confused by any of this, feel free to drop me an e-mail.
Edgar Martinez was not just a good hitter. He was a historically great hitter. Look at
his OBP heading into this season. Martinez post a .423 OBP, good for 17th on the All-Time
list. That is better than Stan Musial, Wade Boggs, and many others considered among the
game's All-Time greats. If you think Edgar Martinez benefit from playing in the offensive
era of the 1990s, consider his OPS+. Edgar ranks 32nd All-Time. That ranks above Nap
Lajoie, Honus Wagner, Ralph Kiner, Willie McCovey, Mike Schmidt, and many other great
hitters. Martinez ranks far above his peers, as we shall see later. And he also rates
favorably among the current crop of Hall of Famers, which we shall also observe.
Of course, Edgar Martinez played as a designated hitter after he turned 32. Should that
effect his HOF opportunity? In my opinion, no. The designated hitter is part of the game.
A team without a strong designated hitter puts itself at a disadvantage, just as they would
without a good center fielder, catcher, or shortstop. Edgar Martinez created runs as a
designated hitter, which translated into wins. He held value as a designated hitter, so I do
not believe it should be held against him. In addition, Edgar DID play third base throughout
the minor leagues and for several years in the Major Leagues, until he turned 32. Martinez
played the field for ten years, so it is not as if he held no defensive value whatsoever.
So if you follow this line of reasoning, the question becomes, to what standard of offense do
we hold Edgar Martinez? Obviously, we hold him to the most difficult standard. I believe
comparing Martinez to first baseman is fair. If you think designated hitters deserve a
higher standard, I am probably not going to convince you at this point anyway. But let us
take a look at Martinez as he compares to different groups and individuals.
Edgar Martinez vs. The Designated Hitters
I believe before we advance deep into this argument, we need to establish that Martinez was
indeed the best designated hitter in baseball history. I looked over the list of DHs, and
found just three who had both substantial careers, and played more than 50% of their games as
a DH, Harold Baines, Don Baylor, and Hal McRae. Among this group, there is simply no
contest...
|
BA/OBP/SLG |
OPS |
OPS+ |
BR/A |
RC |
RC/27 |
Win Shares |
TPW |
Martinez |
315/427/525 |
952 |
151 |
554 |
1567 |
8.64 |
297 |
45.4 |
Baines |
289/359/465 |
824 |
121 |
280 |
1608 |
5.80 |
307 |
15.1 |
Baylor |
260/346/436 |
782 |
119 |
231 |
1247 |
5.17 |
262 |
10.5 |
McRae |
290/355/454 |
809 |
122 |
206 |
1138 |
5.58 |
230 |
13.7 |
Only Harold Baines comes close, and that's only thanks to padding his career stats by
sticking around. A lineup consisting of nine Martinez's would score THREE more runs per game
than a team of Harold Baines. It is no contest.
Edgar Martinez vs. His Peers
"It really needs to be the cream of the crop, the best of the best. Once the Dale
Murphys, Jim Rices, Fred McGriffs, and Bert Blylevens get in what's the point?"
There is a perception that Edgar Martinez is one of the crowd. An equivelent of Fred
McGriff or Jim Rice. Martinez was a far superior hitter than that. Not only was Martinez a
better hitter than McGriff or Rice, Martinez was also better than Sammy Sosa, who I assume
most fans think is a Hall of Fame caliber hitter. Just take a look at their OPS+ statistics
(available at baseball reference.com. Edgar
Martinez comes in at 151, while Rice's is 126, McGriff's is 135, and Sosa's is 134. Not only
was Martinez a better hitter, but he was 15% better over the course of his career.
Edgar Martinez vs. Hall of Fame First Basemen
Here is the big point of the Edgar Martinez argument. I stated earlier that his hitting
statistics should be compared to other Hall of Fame first basemen, for a fair assessment of
his Hall of Fame worthiness. I entered all of the current HOF first basemen into a table,
computed the averages, and ran Martinez's statistics underneath.
|
G |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
BB |
SO |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
OPS+ |
BR/A |
RC |
RC/G |
WS |
TPW |
ASG |
Murray |
3026 |
1627 |
3255 |
560 |
35 |
504 |
1917 |
1333 |
1516 |
0.287 |
0.359 |
0.476 |
0.839 |
130 |
472 |
1939 |
6.11 |
437 |
32.8 |
8 |
Anson |
2277 |
1722 |
3056 |
529 |
124 |
97 |
1880 |
953 |
294 |
0.333 |
0.395 |
0.446 |
0.841 |
138 |
439 |
1756 |
7.71 |
381 |
32.3 |
|
Beckley |
2389 |
1602 |
2934 |
473 |
244 |
87 |
1577 |
616 |
270 |
0.308 |
0.361 |
0.436 |
0.797 |
126 |
303 |
1686 |
6.63 |
318 |
25.0 |
|
Bottomley |
1991 |
1177 |
2313 |
465 |
151 |
219 |
1422 |
664 |
591 |
0.310 |
0.369 |
0.500 |
0.869 |
124 |
251 |
1384 |
6.76 |
258 |
4.1 |
|
Brouthers |
1673 |
1523 |
2367 |
460 |
205 |
106 |
1296 |
840 |
238 |
0.349 |
0.423 |
0.519 |
0.942 |
170 |
621 |
1622 |
9.86 |
355 |
43.5 |
|
Cepeda |
2124 |
1131 |
2351 |
417 |
27 |
379 |
1365 |
588 |
1169 |
0.297 |
0.353 |
0.499 |
0.852 |
133 |
340 |
1338 |
6.07 |
310 |
22.5 |
7 |
Chance |
1288 |
798 |
1274 |
200 |
79 |
20 |
596 |
556 |
|
0.296 |
0.394 |
0.394 |
0.788 |
135 |
217 |
854 |
7.12 |
237 |
24.0 |
|
Connor |
1998 |
1620 |
2542 |
441 |
233 |
138 |
1323 |
1002 |
449 |
0.323 |
0.397 |
0.486 |
0.883 |
155 |
558 |
1647 |
8.30 |
363 |
45.1 |
|
Foxx |
2317 |
1751 |
2646 |
458 |
125 |
534 |
1922 |
1452 |
1311 |
0.325 |
0.428 |
0.609 |
1.038 |
161 |
761 |
2191 |
10.22 |
435 |
59.9 |
9 |
Gehrig |
2164 |
1888 |
2721 |
534 |
163 |
493 |
1995 |
1508 |
790 |
0.340 |
0.447 |
0.632 |
1.080 |
182 |
1006 |
2321 |
11.21 |
489 |
74.6 |
7 |
Greenberg |
1394 |
1051 |
1628 |
379 |
71 |
331 |
1276 |
852 |
844 |
0.313 |
0.412 |
0.605 |
1.017 |
156 |
437 |
1331 |
9.63 |
267 |
35.2 |
5 |
Kelly |
1622 |
819 |
1778 |
337 |
76 |
148 |
1020 |
386 |
694 |
0.297 |
0.342 |
0.452 |
0.794 |
110 |
70 |
918 |
5.47 |
193 |
5.1 |
|
Killebrew |
2435 |
1283 |
2086 |
290 |
24 |
573 |
1584 |
1559 |
1699 |
0.256 |
0.379 |
0.509 |
0.887 |
142 |
498 |
1609 |
6.79 |
371 |
38.7 |
11 |
McCovey |
2588 |
1229 |
2211 |
353 |
46 |
521 |
1555 |
1345 |
1550 |
0.270 |
0.377 |
0.515 |
0.892 |
148 |
554 |
1638 |
7.07 |
408 |
42.7 |
6 |
Mize |
1884 |
1118 |
2011 |
367 |
83 |
359 |
1337 |
856 |
524 |
0.312 |
0.397 |
0.562 |
0.959 |
157 |
498 |
1502 |
8.91 |
338 |
39.0 |
10 |
Perez |
2777 |
1272 |
2732 |
505 |
79 |
379 |
1652 |
925 |
1867 |
0.279 |
0.344 |
0.463 |
0.808 |
122 |
269 |
1523 |
5.51 |
349 |
14.9 |
7 |
Sisler |
2055 |
1284 |
2812 |
425 |
164 |
102 |
1175 |
472 |
327 |
0.340 |
0.379 |
0.468 |
0.847 |
125 |
258 |
1498 |
6.77 |
292 |
17.8 |
|
Terry |
1721 |
1120 |
2193 |
373 |
112 |
154 |
1078 |
537 |
449 |
0.341 |
0.393 |
0.506 |
0.899 |
136 |
337 |
1275 |
7.60 |
278 |
26.9 |
3 |
AVERAGE |
2096 |
1334 |
2384 |
420 |
113 |
286 |
1443 |
914 |
858 |
0.310 |
0.386 |
0.504 |
0.891 |
142 |
438 |
1557 |
7.65 |
338 |
32.5 |
7.3 |
Martinez |
1914 |
1174 |
2119 |
491 |
15 |
297 |
1198 |
1225 |
1095 |
0.315 |
0.427 |
0.525 |
0.952 |
151 |
554 |
1567 |
8.64 |
297 |
45.4 |
7 |
Missing stat lines, such as All-Star games or Frank Chance's strikeouts, are not computed
into averages. Edgar Martinez has a better career batting average, on base percentage, and
slugging percentage. He has more doubles, more home runs, more walks, a better OPS+, more
runs created, more runs created per 27 outs, more TPW, and he's appeared in seven All-Star
games, which is the average for first basemen. Remember that this is a comparison to the
average HOF first baseman, and not the minimum requirements. Edgar Martinez clearly
meets the established standards of the Hall of Fame.
The remaining question here is whether Martinez's short career is held against him.
Admittingly, this is a tougher argument to refute. First off, was his peak so great as to
offset having less games? Look at Total Player Wins. Total Baseball credits Martinez
with 45.4 wins above average, that Martinez created for his team. That is a significant
figure. In the history of baseball, only thirty-four other players have created more wins
above average for their teams. Of the 27 who are eligible for the Hall, 26 are in the Hall.
Of the fifteen who rank BELOW Martinez, 13 are in the Hall. The exceptions are three second
basemen with terrific defensive statistics.
In addition, there are a number of players who played as much or less than Martinez, who
made the Hall. Jim Bottomley, Dan Brouthers, Frank Chance, Hank Greenberg, George Kelly,
Johnny Mize, and Bill Terry. Bill Terry in particular played less than Edgar Martinez, was
not as good as Martinez, but not many seem upset about Terry's induction. Same with George
Sisler. I realize many people have solid opinions about Martinez's candidacy, and they will
likely be unconvinced by any argument. I just hope this column sheds some light on his
candidacy, because he is truly a deserving player.
Send feedback to
Alan Keiper
|